為什麼Twitter犯規推銷者是愚笨的
嘿，您這裡在新的! 我們愛新的人民。
請做我們榮譽返回。 您能訂閱 由RSS飼料或者 由電子郵件得到更新. 我們在張貼的信息也歡迎您的反饋。 當填好表格時，不要忘記留下您的鏈接和您的名字。
為是新的到Twitter和相似的服務的我的好朋友，有Twitter發送同樣的消息到多個新聞組的幾個不同的類型，但今天，我是演講或抱怨或取笑創造錯誤外形并且跟隨幾一千個人為了嘗試和有交通鏈接的人。
這為什麼他們是愚笨的。
1- 退伍軍人twitterers可能容易地察覺您。 您由2個人，但跟隨2000年跟隨。 鏈接在您的外形是對偽造胡扯，并且一個聰明的人不必須點擊它發現。 它叫盤旋。 我的媽媽會盤旋在鏈接和看什麼在狀態欄出現。
2- 即使您可能拉扯領域映射或改方向使某人點擊鏈接… hm…. 怎麼能我精美地投入此….？
否。 一. 關心。
并且大家將記住您明顯的企圖擰緊他們在珍貴的秒鐘他們的生活外面。
3- 我們看，您沒得到由多數人點擊。 的那些人不說， 「oh哇，現金驚奇Viagra金字塔計劃! 我等待嘗試它! 謝謝先生。 犯規推銷者!」 如此它仍然是愚笨的浪費時間，甚而錯誤邏輯「它如此只需要幾分鐘，即使我可以使一個人買它值得它」。
并且現在，我恨您和那家公司為浪費我的時間。 由於礦，不同於你的，實際上是金錢。 
如此，這是呼喊對根本上是一個好人的人，但被認為的立刻弱點發送同樣的消息到多個新聞組一個社會網絡是一個好方式得到一些快速的點擊和掙一些錢。
否。
And to the rest of you, if you think it’s not happening on your favorite social network, think again.
Please Vote! - Your Opinion Matters to Us.
Categories: social media
I completely agree. I only wish that everyone was completely aware. The Spammers actually do get clicks, which is what they’re after. Sorry , but it works. Until Twitter puts some follow limits in place, this will continue to be a trend.
Using my definition, ALL twitter “tweets” are spam. They might not all be trying to sell something, but they are 1)useless 2)boring 3)unnecessary 4)a complete, total and utter waste of time.
Am I being to harsh on twitter?
BSA,
That depends on what your definition of “works” is. If a meaningless click out of curiosity that won’t result in a sale meets that definition, then sure, it “works”. But if effective, targeted traffic is the goal? Then no, it actually doesn’t work. My point is that, as Mark Joyner so famously said, all clicks are not created equal.
And if more potential spammers were educated of this before they tried to take the easy money route, they’d stop. Some spammers are, sadly, regular people who have bought some $4000 course written by people who know nothing about the Internet and have been fooled into thinking they can get over on people online to make money. Occassionally, I’m able to intercept those people before they start.
JP,
Sounds like a personal problem.
You should get that looked at…
Just kidding. Seriously though? The debate over whether Twitter is useful was over in… oh… 2007. Early. 2007. Now whether it’s useful for YOU? Another matter entirely. If you want it to be? It can be. If you don’t - seems like a waste of time to read — and then to respond — to posts about Twitter.